>
The recent agreement between Nokia and Microsoft to use Windows Phone 7 on their devices has sparked a sea of discussions about the telecommunications market.
I read in one post in particular, an international voice, ventilate the hypothesis of a possible future acquisition by Microsoft that Nokia has thrown in the bucket Symbian, old system and unable to compete with Android and Apple.
I do not understand this choice of Nokia.
I do not understand why they are giving up. Symbian was perhaps even re-development from scratch, but not abandoned.
Mainly I do not understand when a plan was a key development in open source system the global community of developers has not adhered to the one shown more enthusiasm for the contributions on Android.
Symbian is a heritage to preserve, to be rewritten, but
maintaining it is to keep alive another competitor for Apple and Android!
maintaining it is to keep alive another competitor for Apple and Android!
I do not understand then how can there be so much enthusiasm on the part of professionals to (a single device manufactured by Apple) iPhone 4. All excited! Let’s face it is not very good! Do not you agree? I do not have to change your mind and in fact is a terminal of success, but not that great even if it cost half (with the exception of the display).
Android is famous to allocate a very high consumption of batteries (not an unsolvable problem) but this is not a matter of little consequence.
Each competitor has his own issues…
In other words, Nokia like many companies in this moment of crisis is “putting a man still alive under ground”!









>iPhone 4's charger is exploded at Turin, Italy: http://www.telefonino.net/Apple/Notizie/n26461/Scoppia-caricabatterie-di-un-iPhone-ferita-bimba.html